Legal Opinion

Collingwood v. Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 29, 1950No. 593Published

1Opinion of the Court

62 S.E.2d 87 (1950)

232 N.C. 724

COLLINGWOOD

v.

WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RY. CO.

No. 593.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 29, 1950.

R. L. Smith & Son, Albemarle, Craige & Craige, Winston-Salem, Kerr Craige Ramsey, Salisbury, for petitioner.

H. C. Turner, Albemarle, for respondent.

WINBORNE, Justice.

This case relates to a collision between plaintiff's car and an engine and tender of defendant at a road crossing over defendant's railroad.

The grounds upon which the present petition to rehear is based are that the opinion reported in 232 N.C. 192, 59 S.E.2d 584, fails to recognize as meritorious…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corruthers v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Collingwood v. Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Lunsford v. MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Carruthers v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Collingwood v. Winston-Salem Southbound Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API