Legal Opinion

Fink v. Scott

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1928No. 6150PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

This is a notice of motion for judgment by the holder of a negotiable promissory note against the maker thereof. Upon a judgment of the circuit court of Raleigh county for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

The note was made to “Lyda & Ridinger” and on the back thereof contains the following endorsements: “Lyda & Rid-inger, by C. F. Lyda.”, and below, “C. F. Lyda”. The notice, which fully describes the note, was accompanied by a statement of account and the statutory form of affidavit. Defendant filed his counter affidavit, denying that there is any sum due from him to plaintiff,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  2. Bausman v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Laas v. LubicWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. Peoples BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Kaufman v. State Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. Maryland Trust Co. v. GregoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. First National Bank v. DanielSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Fink v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. City of Richmond v. BaerRichmond County Circuit Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API