Legal Opinion

In re Clement

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application for the revocation and cancellation of a liquor tax certificate.

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

Within the radius of 200 feet from 430 Ridge-wood avenue there were¿ in November, 1907, seventeen buildings claimed to be occupied exclusively as dwellings. For six of these no valid consents were given.

As to 415 Ridgewood avenue, the consent was signed by Florence Mahoney, but his wife, Julia Mahoney, was. the owner; while, as to 414 Ridgewood avenue, the consent was signed and acknowledged by Mr. Stafford, but not his wife, who was ioint owner of the property. Quigley v. Monsees, 56 Misc. Rep. 110..If there were seventeen dwellings, the defendants had eleven consents, or not quite…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quigley v. MonseesNew York Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Mangone v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re HenryNew York Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API