Legal Opinion

Seith v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Michael F. Bargine and Kathleen M. Bargine appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated January 26, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

An abutting landowner is generally not liable to a pedestrian who sustains an injury on a public sidewalk unless, inter alia, the landowner created the condition or had a statutory duty to maintain the sidewalk (see…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Meyer v. GuintaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Winberry v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Berlinger v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Quinn v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Araujo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Cordova v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Araujo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API