Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sale v. Nortoni

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 1906PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Prohibition. (1) The St. Louis Court of Appeals has no appellate jurisdiction over the certiorari case, nor has- it any original jurisdiction by prohibition- to interfere with the circuit court in the trial and determination of the certiorari case. State ex rel. v. Bombauer, 101 Mo. 499; State ex rel.

Read the full summary

Prohibition. (1) The St. Louis Court of Appeals has no appellate jurisdiction over the certiorari case, nor has- it any original jurisdiction by prohibition- to interfere with the circuit court in the trial and determination of the certiorari case. State ex rel. v. Bombauer, 101 Mo. 499; State ex rel. Bombauer-, 105 Mo. 104; State ex rel. v. Bombauer, 104 Mo. 624; Sanders v. Sack, 142 Mo. 260 ; State ex rel. v. Hill, 152 Mo. 239; State ex rel. v. Harter, 188 Mo. 527; State ex rel. v. Allen, 45 Mo. App. 557; State ex rel. v. Gauzhorn, 52 Mo. App. 223; Railroad v. McGregor, 53 Mo. App. 368;…

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

These three cases present the same issues, and will, therefore, be considered together.

This is an original proceeding by prohibition, instituted by two of the judges of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, namely, Moses N. Sale and J esse McDonald, judges of divisions number seven and three of said court, with whom are joined private relators interested as parties litigant in the litigation involved, against respondents Nortoni, Bland and Goode, judges of the St. Louis Court of Appeals. A preliminary rule in prohibition was issued on the 10th day of September, 1906, by two members of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCaffery v. AloeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Blakemore v. RombauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. State ex rel. School District v. HarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. State ex rel. Macklin v. RombauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. State ex rel. Frisby v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fogarty v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Stout v. K. C. Terminal Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Wendling v. BowdenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. City of St. Louis ex rel. Contracting & Supply Co. v. Hill-O'Meara Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Ex parte NelsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API