Legal Opinion

Hyman-Michaels Co. v. Ashmus Equipment Sales Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1957Published

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.

Appellant insists that the judgment for costs and the judgment of the municipal court are decidedly separate, each from the other, although the supreme court has remitted its judgment for costs to the lower court where the final judgment was entered; and therefore the relief of setoff cannot be allowed. There is no occasion, under the circumstances now before us, for separate and distinct executions moving from different jurisdictions. The defendant points to sec. 331.07 (7), Stats., as authority, but that section provides that a setoff may be directed when the parties in interest are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Black v. Whitewater Commercial & Savings BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API