Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Bepler

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided July 1, 1897Published

1Opinion of the CourtHollister, J.

On the trial of consolidated actions involving the rights of the parties named in the title, it appeared that Riehle, a builder, constructed a house for'Adelheid Bepler, and was paid what was due him therefor less $189.60, which she is ready to pay to whomsoever is entitled to it. Riehle was indebted to J. B. Doppes & Sons, for lumber used in building the house, in the sum of $479.04, for which they sought to obtain and enforce a lien against Mrs. Bepler’s property, on which the house had been built. All of the steps to perfect, the lien had been taken by Doppes & Son as provided by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Spraigue v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Robinson v. BidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. People Ex Rel. Angerstein v. KenneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API