RONI LLC v. Arfa
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs. Plaintiffs’ conclusory pleadings do not give rise to an inference that the attorney defendants knowingly participated in the alleged aiding and abetting of a breach of fiduciary duty by providing substantial assistance to the promoter defendants in their purported commission scheme (see Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113, 126 [1st Dept 2003]; see generally Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 NY3d 553 [2009]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eurycleia Partners, LP v. Seward & Kissel, LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kaufman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by15 opinions
- Palmetto Partners, L.P. v. AJW Qualified Partners, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Schroeder v. Pinterest Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Baron v. GalassoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ferring B.V. v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Gregor v. RossiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.