Legal Opinion
Maxwell v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 2, 2014No. Court of Appeals No. 12CA1802PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE WEBB
T1 This putative class action concerns uninsured /underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage. Plaintiffs, James and Janet Maxwell and Leon Hill, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, assert that defendants, United Services Automobile Association and USAA Casualty Insurance Company (collectively, USAA), fraudulently concealed information necessary for USAA insureds to make informed decisions about purchasing UM/UIM coverage on their additional vehicles. They pleaded claims for fraudulent concealment, insurer bad faith, and violation of the Colorado…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- In Re Flag Telecom Holdings Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jehly v. BrownColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Jones v. SamoraColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- State of Colorado v. Robert J. Hopp & Associates, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Zurich American Insurance Company v. Southern Connecticut Gas CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020