Kosalka v. Town of Georgetown
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.
[¶ 1] Eric and Patricia Kosalka appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Sagadahoc County, Calkins, J.) upholding as constitutional a provision of the Georgetown Shoreland Zoning Ordinance that all conditional use developments “conserve natural beauty.” Several abutting landowners cross appeal, contending that the proposed site is located within a zone that does not allow campgrounds as conditional uses. The record supports a finding that the proposed site is in a district that allows campgrounds. We conclude, however, that the “conserve natural beauty” requirement is an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shapiro Bros. Shoe Co. v. Lewiston-Auburn Shoeworkers Protective Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Stucki v. PlavinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Waterville Hotel Corp. v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Cope v. Inhabitants of Town of BrunswickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Gorham v. Town of Cape ElizabethSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hannum v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Stewart v. Town of SedgwickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Uliano v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Widewaters Stillwater Co. v. Bangor Area Citizens Organized for Responsible DevelopmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Lewis v. Maine Coast ArtistsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.