Mandeville v. Askew, Bradley & Co.

Hall, Justice.

A party on whom a summons of garnishment was served, answered the same at the December term, 1885, of the j ustice’s court to which it was made returnable, when the plaintiff appeared and traversed the answer, and at the next February term of the court, when the case was called and both parties announced ready, a motion was made and sustained to discharge the garnishee, because no *19written notice was given to him or his counsel, as required by §4162 of the code of 1882, of the traverse of his answer and the time appointed by the justice of the peace for hearing the issue formed…