State v. Perry
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceBaeNHIll, J.
We may not concern ourselves about the ■distance the vehicle traveled on the public highway, if at all. If defendant, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, put the vehicle in 'motion and operated it for any distance on any part of a highway in this State, he is guilty as charged. The one question presented is as to whether a sidewalk is a part of a highway within the meaning of G.S. ■20-138.
Decision is made to rest on the definition of “Street and Highway” contained in the statute which created the offense for which defendant was tried. G.S. 20-38 (cc). This is as it should be,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bunch v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Wood Ex Rel. Putnam v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Russell v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Willis v. . New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Hester v. Traction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.