Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Morgan

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 10, 1993No. 67,610; CMR No. 8901706Published

1ConcurrenceSullivan, Chief Judge

Appellant did not request an instruction that a finding of voluntary intoxication on his part would reduce his crime from unpremeditated murder to voluntary manslaughter. Moreover, he did not object to the failure of the military judge to sua sponte give this instruction to the members. Thus, the appropriate framework for resolving this case is the doctrine of plain error. See generally Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145, 97 S.Ct. 1730, 52 L.Ed.2d 203 (1977). See RCM 920(f), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984.

Assuming error in the judge’s failure to sua sponte give the above…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. TilleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API