United States v. Morgan
United States Court of Military Appeals
1ConcurrenceSullivan, Chief Judge
Appellant did not request an instruction that a finding of voluntary intoxication on his part would reduce his crime from unpremeditated murder to voluntary manslaughter. Moreover, he did not object to the failure of the military judge to sua sponte give this instruction to the members. Thus, the appropriate framework for resolving this case is the doctrine of plain error. See generally Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145, 97 S.Ct. 1730, 52 L.Ed.2d 203 (1977). See RCM 920(f), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984.
Assuming error in the judge’s failure to sua sponte give the above…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. TilleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987