Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Bd. v. Hamer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 29, 2018No. 17-1599PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

APPEL, Justice.

In this attorney disciplinary case, we are called upon once again to remind the Iowa bar that while our ethics rules allow attorneys to engage in financial transactions with clients and to represent both party clients in a financial transaction, the demanding nature of the disclosures required and the necessity of documenting informed consent mean that these matters may not be undertaken lightly as a matter of informal routine.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board (Board) charged attorney Mark Hamer with multiple violations of the Iowa Code of Professional…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Aden v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Top of Iowa Cooperative v. Sime Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Jeffrey K. McGinnessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Edward Netti, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Dennis R. MathahsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. ChvalaNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Bonnie J. HeggenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Bruce A. WilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. William Wayne RannigerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API