McGarry v. Skogley
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
McGarry’s lawsuit against Skogley was dismissed after a jury found that he suffered no “serious injury” when his Chevrolet van was rear-ended by Skogley’s Buick convertible. The appeal of the dismissal raises questions which are first impressions for this court under “no-fault” insurance. 1 This case leads us to understand why some courts have found it necessary, when encountering difficulties with no-fault cases, to use such descriptive words as “resist reconciliation,” 2 “positive repugnancy,” 3 “irreconcilable inconsistencies,” 4 and “the legislature should revisit the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Wasem v. LaskowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Sanders v. RickardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Reyes v. BanksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. HauserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moser v. WilhelmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Allen v. KlevenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Grzadzielewski v. Walsh County Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Matter of Estate of FlahertyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.