Legal Opinion

McGarry v. Skogley

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1979No. Civ. 9509PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

McGarry’s lawsuit against Skogley was dismissed after a jury found that he suffered no “serious injury” when his Chevrolet van was rear-ended by Skogley’s Buick convertible. The appeal of the dismissal raises questions which are first impressions for this court under “no-fault” insurance. 1 This case leads us to understand why some courts have found it necessary, when encountering difficulties with no-fault cases, to use such descriptive words as “resist reconciliation,” 2 “positive repugnancy,” 3 “irreconcilable inconsistencies,” 4 and “the legislature should revisit the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. Wasem v. LaskowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Sanders v. RickardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Reyes v. BanksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. HauserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moser v. WilhelmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Allen v. KlevenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Grzadzielewski v. Walsh County Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Matter of Estate of FlahertyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API