Department of Human Services v. Moore
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
DAN M. LEE,
Presiding Justice, concurring in part, dissenting in part:
I concur with parts L, II., and V. of the majority’s opinion. However, with regard to parts III. and IV. of that opinion, I respectfully dissent.
The majority correctly states in the introductory portion of its opinion that, “[e]vi-dence presented at trial concerning the relationship between Milton and Pattie is in obvious conflict.” It is unclear which specific testimony adduced at trial, concerning Pat-tie’s alleged relationship(s) with other men, ' which troubles the majority. Because of the conflicting evidence presented…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Catholic Diocese of Natchez-Jackson v. JaquithMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
- Copiah Dairies, Inc. v. AddkisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Ball v. SloanMississippi Supreme Court · 1990