Legal Opinion

Devin Michael Smith v. Warden

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 14, 2020No. 5:20-cv-00729Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEVIN MICHAEL SMITH, Case No. 5:20-cv-00729-DSF (AFM) 12 Petitioner, ORDER SUMMARILY 13 v. DISMISSING PETITION FOR 14 WARDEN, WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ( 28 U.S.C. § 2254) 15 Respondent. 16 On April 9, 2020, Petitioner, who is currently in the Metropolitan State 17 Hospital undergoing competency proceedings, filed this petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. As explained below, the petition is subject to 19 summary dismissal without prejudice. 20 PETITIONER’S ALLEGATIONS 21 According…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Brown v. AhernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API