Legal Opinion
Bigham v. Tinsley
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 7, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from Pemiscot Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry C. Riley, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM —
The appeal in this case was prosecuted to this court, hut it was transferred to the .Springfield Court of Appeals under the provisions of an Act of the Legislature, approved June 12, 1909. [See Laws of Missouri 1909, p. 396; see, also, Sec. 3939', R. S. 1909.] Afterwards, the Springfield Court of Appeals disposed of the case through an opinion prepared by Judge Nixon of that court, which may be found reported under the title of Bigham v. Tinsley, 149 Mo. App. 467, 130 S. W. 506. Subsequently, the Supreme Court declared the legislative act, which purported to authorize the transfer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- State ex rel. Dunham v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- State ex rel. O'Malley v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Bigham v. TinsleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- Epstein v. WaasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923