Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1999No. ED 75844PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES R. DOWD, Judge.

The Director of Revenue (“Director”) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis City. This judgment reinstated Mr. Atkins’s driver’s license and assessed costs against the Director.

“Absent a statute to the contrary, costs are not recoverable from the state in its own courts.” Reed v. Director of Revenue, 834 S.W.2d 834, 837 (Mo.App.1992). Section 536.087.1 RSMO 1994 provides for recovering costs against the state; however, driver’s license proceedings are excluded from this statute by Section 536.085.1 RSMo 1994. Furthermore, Mr. Atkins conceded this issue…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Reed v. Director of Revenue, StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Gibson v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pavlica v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Hobbs v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Boulware v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Vandewiele v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Arnette v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API