Ravenel v. Shipman

The theory of this action is that the item found on the ‘ back of page 6 of Miss Archer’s will is' a part thereof and that plaintiff is entitled to have the court construe this provision. Appellants concur in this theory and contend that, by implication, the item is a bequest to them of sums of money in the amount set opposite their respective names. Appellee, however, contends that the so-called bequest is void for indefiniteness.

'The'Rem in question contains no dispositive "expression. That Miss Archer knew the appropriate language to use in making a testamentary gift is shown in each of…