Legal Opinion

Echols v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1989No. A89A0376Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Mary Jane Echols brought suit against Charles E. Clark, an attorney, alleging professional malpractice in his handling of her claim for recovery of insurance benefits. The trial court denied Echols’ mo*578tion for partial summary judgment as to liability and granted Clark’s motion for summary judgment, and Echols appeals.

The record reveals that appellant was a named insured on an automobile liability insurance policy issued to her husband by Sentry Insurance Company in 1974, prior to the effective date of the Georgia Motor Vehicle Accident Reparations Act (Ga. L. 1974, p. 113). The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wiard v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Stafford v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Wiard v. Phoenix InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Sentry Insurance v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Parten v. SwanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API