Doe v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*752Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Petitioner Shawna Doe filed a petition for writ of mandate to challenge the trial court’s ruling that, although she was permitted to pursue her action under a fictitious name, she was required to provide verifications signed in her true name in connection with discovery responses. We agree with petitioner that, under the circumstances, she may submit verifications with her fictitious name. We therefore grant the writ petition.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Petitioner Shawna Doe was raped by Andrew Luster,1 after he rendered her unconscious by the surreptitious…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zurich American Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Reese v. GuyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Doe v. Lincoln Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Ibarra v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Chubbs CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015