Legal Opinion

Doe v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 2011No. B228748PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*752Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Petitioner Shawna Doe filed a petition for writ of mandate to challenge the trial court’s ruling that, although she was permitted to pursue her action under a fictitious name, she was required to provide verifications signed in her true name in connection with discovery responses. We agree with petitioner that, under the circumstances, she may submit verifications with her fictitious name. We therefore grant the writ petition.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Petitioner Shawna Doe was raped by Andrew Luster,1 after he rendered her unconscious by the surreptitious…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zurich American Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Reese v. GuyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Doe v. Lincoln Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Ibarra v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. Chubbs CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API