Legal Opinion
Eugene F. MAROTTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. USERY, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 6, 1980No. 78-1341PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYATT, District Judge:
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant, the Secretary of Labor, entered on a decision of Judge Orrick in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, after trial without a jury. Appellant Marotta, a white employee of the federal government, working in the Department of Labor, sued under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(l) a part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which was extended to employees of the federal government by 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c), a part of the Equal Opportunity Act of 1972. He complained of so-called “reverse…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NovotnySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adam BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAVANNAH SUGAR REFINING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Slack v. HavensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Day v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Dorothy L. Milton v. Casper Weinberger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Metoyer v. ChassmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ricardo Luis JAUREGUI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF GLENDALE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Herbert NANTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the BARROWS COMPANY, Formerly Barrows Furniture Company, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.