Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lanning Construction, Inc. v. Rozell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1982No. 13397Published

1DissentWollman, Chief Justice

On the basis of the facts as set forth in the majority opinion, I would hold that there was sufficient evidence of an independent oral contract to warrant' submitting the issue to the jury. Barnes v. Hill City Lumber Co., 34 S.D. 158, 147 N.W. 775 (1914); Putnam v. Dickinson, 142 N.W.2d 111 (N.D.1966). Accordingly, I would reverse the judgment notwithstanding the verdict and direct the trial court to reinstate the jury verdict.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Putnam v. DickinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Barnes v. Hill City Lumber Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1914