Morrow v. State

on appellant’s motion for rehearing.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant first discusses the opinion of this court dealing with his Bills of Exception Numbers 3 and 4. He says his objections did not go to the fact of appellant’s release from such hospital, but to the language in the “purported” order of release containing the statement “* * * *27discharged without psychosis” and to the further fact that the witness was permitted to testify that “The staff of psychiatrists passed on his sanity.” We have analyzed these bills thoroughly and cannot give to the objection the effect…