State v. Byrd
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Justice.
In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred in dismissing the presentment against the defendants when, in response to their motion for a bill of particulars, the state was unable to designate a specific date on which the charged offenses were alleged to have occurred. Because we agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals that the trial court dismissed the presentment prematurely, we affirm the judgment of the intermediate court and remand the case to the trial court for fur ther proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. Procedural…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HaynesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- State v. HicksTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ShawTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. WestCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- State v. AndersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
3Cited by139 opinions
- State v. DorantesTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Wyatt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MajorsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. LemacksTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.