United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL, District Judge.
The cause of action set out in the bill of complaint, stated briefly and in substance, is as follows: That the defendant, a Virginia corporation engaged in the business of producing, distributing, and selling eléctric power, has begun and is continuing the construction of a dam across the New river near Radford in Pulaski county, Va., for the purpose of impounding the waters of that river and utilizing the same for generating electric power; that the New river is a stream which arises in-the northwestern part of the State of North Carolina and flows in a general northerly…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Consumers Power Co. v. Big Prairie TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Boerner v. McCallisterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Walling v. Builders' Veneer & Woodwork Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.