Cunningham v. Holzmark

This is a suit for breach of contract to procure theft insurance on plaintiff’s automobile. There was a verdict and judgment iii favor of plaintiff in the sum of $800. Defendants have appealed.

The facts show that defendants are partners engaged in the selling of automobiles in Kansas City; that Mr. Fox, a salesman of defendants came to plaintiff’s home and solicited him to purchase an automobile from defendants; that on May 2, 1926, plaintiff, at his home, signed an order in blank for the purchase of such an automobile; that the order contained printed stipulations in reference to the sale of…