Legal Opinion

Hill v. Salmon

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1951No. 2513PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Blume, Justice.

This action was commenced in Justice Court as an action of forcible entry and detainer to gain possession of the property hereinafter described. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff, R. Lee Hill. The defendants, Raymond R. Salmon and others, appealed the case to the District Court. That court ,too, entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and the defendants thereupon appealed the case to this court. The facts are as follows:

Plaintiff R. Lee Hill and his wife executed a warranty deed dated January 23, 1948, to Raymond R. Salmon and Otto Waldron for “the following…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Peterson v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Exchange State Bank v. Occident Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Klaus v. Majestic Apartment House Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Voight v. OttArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gladstone Hotel, Inc. v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Gladstone Hotel, Inc. v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Wyoming State Farm Loan Board v. Farm Credit System Capital Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wyoming State Farm Loan Board v. Farm Credit System Capital Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API