Brown v. State

Pee Curiam.

The appellant asserts three grounds for the reversal of the judgment and sentence in this case. These are: first, that his plea of guilty was not made with a full understanding of its nature and effect; second, that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction; and third, that the sentence was not proper, the implication being that it was cruel and unusual.

All three of these propositions are urged by the appellant himself, and his counsel has so presented them in the brief. Counsel in cases such as this, where the defendant insists upon taking an appeal despite the…