New Telephone Co. v. Foley
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Marion Superior Court; Vinson Garter, Judge. Action by Daniel Foley against the New Telephone Company on a contract for the repair of a street. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.
This action is founded upon a contract in terms as follows: “Indianapolis, Ind., July 14th, 1898. We, the undersigned, agree to pay Daniel Foley $3.25 per square yard for repairing Pearl street from the intersection of Pearl and Alabama streets, at the beginning of the wing; *419of Alabama street,' to tbe wing of New Jersey street. The price hereby agreed to be paid, is to be determined from the actual measurement of trench in said Pearl street, as determined by the measurement by the city engineer. New Telephone Co. H. B. Gates, Sec’y.”
The court made special findings of fact and stated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
- President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- White v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- Leu v. Commercial Mutual Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Georgia Life Ins. v. Mississippi Cent. R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1917
- Goodwine v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904