Legal Opinion

Cicero v. Borg-Warner Automotive, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 2, 2002No. 00-1022Published

1Opinion of the Court

280 F.3d 579

Thomas L. CICERO and Marlene Cicero, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

BORG-WARNER AUTOMOTIVE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and Borg-Warner Automotive Automatic Transmission Systems Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-1022.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued September 19, 2001.

Decided and Filed January 2, 2002.*

1

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Michael V. Kell (briefed), Margaret A. Lynch (argued and briefed), Kell & Lynch, Birmingham, MI, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

2

Thomas L. Fleury (argued and briefed), Jonathon A. Rabin (briefed), Keller, Thomas,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API