Legal Opinion

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison v. Westergaard

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

This is an action to recover for legal services. The plaintiff law firm billed its client, a limited partnership, for a fee, a portion of which the limited partnership paid. The effort in this action to recover the balance of the fee from the individual shareholder of a corporate participant in the limited partnership must be rejected. It is not supported by any evidence of an enforceable independent promise by the individual to pay the limited partnership’s obligation and is clearly barred by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin Roofing, Inc. v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carducci v. BensimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co. v. Estate of ShortNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Carducci v. BensimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Corporate Structures, Inc. v. CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Hamburger, Maxson & Yaffe, L. L. P. v. SolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API