Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1983No. 7092PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

David Smith appeals from three parts of a divorce decree. We affirm the superior court’s division of marital property and its decision to award custody of the Smith’s child to Susan Smith. With respect to the superior court’s award of child support, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

At the time of their divorce, the Smiths owned almost $200,000 in property, including an Anchorage house, California real estate, a boat, a motor home, stocks, bonds, jewelry, furs, crystal and silver. Our review of the record leads us to the conclusion that appellant David…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beck v. BeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Houger v. HougerAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Sheridan v. SheridanAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lone Wolf v. Lone WolfAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Julsen v. JulsenAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Coghill v. CoghillAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Adrian v. AdrianAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. McClain v. McClainAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API