Legal Opinion

Dobbins v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 14, 1966No. 14679PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is a damage suit. The principal question to be discussed concerns the effect of conflicting answers made by the jury to the special issues submitted.

In answer to Special Issues 1 and 2 the jury found that a gauze pack was left in appellant’s vagina and that this constituted negligence on the part of appellee.

Special Issues 3, 6 and 7, and the answers returned by the jury, follow:

Special Issue No. 3

Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that such negligence, if any you have so found, was a proximate cause of any damage or harm to the physical structure of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ford Butane Eq. Co. v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Casualty Underwriters v. RhoneTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Bradford v. ArhelgerTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. Pioneer Bus Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. William Leo Kuhn and Patti Clarice Kuhn v. Palmer A. Gilleland, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API