Dobbins v. Gardner
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
This is a damage suit. The principal question to be discussed concerns the effect of conflicting answers made by the jury to the special issues submitted.
In answer to Special Issues 1 and 2 the jury found that a gauze pack was left in appellant’s vagina and that this constituted negligence on the part of appellee.
Special Issues 3, 6 and 7, and the answers returned by the jury, follow:
Special Issue No. 3
Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that such negligence, if any you have so found, was a proximate cause of any damage or harm to the physical structure of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Ford Butane Eq. Co. v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Casualty Underwriters v. RhoneTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Bradford v. ArhelgerTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Strickland v. Pioneer Bus Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- William Leo Kuhn and Patti Clarice Kuhn v. Palmer A. Gilleland, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994