Legal Opinion
Murphy v. East Portland
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon
Decided June 9, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.
This suit is brought by the plaintiff, a citizen of Washington, to enjoin the defendants, the municipal corporation of East Portland, the mayor and common council of the same, and the Oregon corporation, the East Side Water Company, from passing a certain ordinance, now pending before said council.
■ It is alleged in the bill that the plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land within-the limits of the town of East -Portland,' assessed therein at *309§5,600, upon which municipal taxes for the year 1890 were levied to the amount of §42.00; that the act incorporating said town provides ‘•that no debt…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alpers v. City and County of San FranciscoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1887
- Salem Water Co. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1873
- Spring Valley Water-Works v. BartlettUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Los Angeles City Water Co. v. City of Los AngelesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1898
- Brewster v. Deschutes CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co. v. NattinDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.