Legal Opinion

Canteen Corp. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 2003PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.1

The issue presented is whether a corporate taxpayer’s gain from the fictional liq*596uidation of assets deemed to occur under a federal tax election pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 338(h)(10) is taxable by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as business income or non-business income. In exceptions to the decision by a panel of this court,2 Canteen Corporation (Canteen) challenges the legal conclusion that its parent corporation’s federal tax election under Section 338(h)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), 26 U.S.C. § 338(h)(10), which results in a fictitious sale of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Laurel Pipe Line Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Norris v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Ross-Araco v. Com., Bd. of Fin. & Rev.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Welded Tube Co. of America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Rump v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Glatfelter Pulpwood Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. American States Insurance v. HamerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Glatfelter Pulpwood Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. McKesson Water Products Co. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2007
  5. RB Alden Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API