Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1934No. 31,693PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is a mandamus action commenced in the district court of Sedgwick county by S. W. Murphy against Charles F. Hobbs, as commissioner of insurance of the state of Kansas, to require the commissioner to issue a license to the petitioner authorizing him to do business as a life insurance agent.

The plaintiff set out in his petition that he had held such a license and was fully qualified to continue doing so, but that a complaint had been filed with the commissioner against him, and after a hearing before the commissioner his license was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration & ExaminationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Schaake v. DolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Brewster v. MohlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Mid-West Photo Play Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Swearingen v. Bond, AuditorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Butler v. RudeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. National Mutual Casualty Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Anderson v. HedgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Fidelity Life Ass'n v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API