PHARISIEN v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KHOUZAM, Judge.
Jerry Pharisien appeals his convictions and sentences for second-degree murder with a firearm and attempted second-degree murder with a firearm. We write to address his argument that the jury instruction given on manslaughter by act was fundamentally erroneous because it indicated that a conviction for manslaughter required proof that he intended to kill the victim. As we conclude that the manslaughter instruction that was given in Pharisien’s case was not error, we affirm and certify conflict with the First District. We note that this court recently reached the same result in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- In Re Standard Instruct. in Cr. Cases No. 2007-10Supreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Riesel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Barros-Dias v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Pryor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Black v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. JERRY PHARISIENDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019