Legal Opinion

In re Crawford Wollen Co.

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided January 8, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings of the Crawford Wollen Company. On petition of Terhune, Nearing & Co. to revise the referee’s order determining that petitioners were not entitled to priority under a state statute for the amount of their claim,, but permitting them to file their claim for a preference to the amount of $300 and as an unsecured claim for the balance.

1Opinion of the Court

DAYTON, District Judge.

The bankrupt is a corporation, and was engaged in the manufacture of woolen fabrics at Martinsburg, this dis-, trict. The petitioners compose a partnership doing business in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The corporation has been adjudged an involuntary bankrupt, and petitioners have sought to file a claim for $7,605.09 as a preferred one, under and by virtue of section 7, c. 75 (section 3848, Hogg’s Code 1913) of the Code of West Virginia, which provides:

“Every workman, laborer, or other person who shall do or perform any work or labor, by virtue of - any contract for any…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American Casualty Insurance Company's CaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  2. Matter of StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. In re Rouse, Hazard & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899
  4. Vane v. NewcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Griffith v. Blackwater Boom & Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Rodgers & Garrett Timber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1927
  2. Cavanaugh v. Art Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API