Legal Opinion

Manganaro Corp. v. HITT Contracting, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 22, 2002No. Civil Action 00-401 (JMF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.

Introduction

This case arises out of a contract dispute between plaintiff Manganaro Corporation (“Manganaro”) and defendant HITT Contracting, Inc. (“HITT”). Manganaro, a Maryland corporation, sued HITT, a Virginia corporation, for breach of contract arising out of a construction project for Lu-cent Technologies (“Lucent”). The Lucent project, located at Metropolitan Square, 1450 G Street in Washington, D.C., was to be performed on a fast-track basis. HITT, Lucent’s prime contractor, hired…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ida Maxwell Wells v. G. Gordon Liddy, Phillip MacKin Bailley, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. Dairyland Insurance v. DouthatSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  4. Dery v. General Motors Corp. (In Re Fordson Engineering Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  5. Galloway Corp. v. S.B. Ballard Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The CUNEO LAW GROUP, PC v. JosephDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Camacho Family Partnership v. Patricia I. Romero, Inc.District Court, D. Guam · 2016
  3. Cuneo Law Group, P.CDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API