Legal Opinion
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided June 28, 2006No. 5:98-CV-1039PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On May 10, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a Mandate remanding this matter for consideration in light of Cooper Indus., Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc., 543 U.S. 157, 125 S.Ct. 577, 160 L.Ed.2d 548 (2004). The Mandate was filed on May 16, 2005.
Accordingly, defendants Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (“Chevron”); Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”); King Service, Inc. (“King”); 1 and Portee, Inc. (“Portee”) filed briefs addressing the issue as set forth in the Mandate. United States Steel (“USX”)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Nowak v. Ironworkers Local 6 Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Ugi Utilities, Inc., Docket No. 04-2409-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Bedford Affiliates v. SillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Schaefer v. Town of VictorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Booth Oil Site Administrative Group v. Safety-Kleen Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Basf Catalysts LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.