Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Crane

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1960No. Docket 54, Calendar 48,575PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

This appeal represents a controversy between plaintiff cottage and resort owners on an inland Michigan lake and defendant, a farmer with a fruit orchard, who was using the lake water for irrigation. The chancellor who heard the matter ruled that defendant had a right to reasonable use of lake water. The decree defined such reasonable use in terms which were unsatisfactory to plaintiffs who have appealed.

The testimony taken before the chancellor pertained to the situation at Hutchins lake, in Allegan county, during the summer of 1958. Defendant is a fruit farmer who owns a 180-acre farm…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dumont v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. People v. HulbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Harris v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Red River Roller Mills v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Gehlen Bros. v. KnorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. White Lake Improvement Ass'n v. City of WhitehallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. West Michigan Dock & Market Corp. v. Lakeland InvestmentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation v. Nestlé Waters North America IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Franco-American Charolaise, Ltd. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API