Legal Opinion

Hulsey v. Sargent

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1993No. Civ. PB-C-81-002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EISELE, District Judge.

Before the Court is Petitioner’s Third Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner alleges three specific violations of his constitutional rights arising during the penalty phase of his bifurcated trial, and a fourth, generalized, claim of ineffective assistance of counsel during both trial phases, on direct appeal and in relation to collateral proceedings. 1 The Court will order the writ to issue on two of the four grounds. It will not reach the other two claims.

I. CLAIMS AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE

Petitioner was convicted…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. State v. MarshSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. SpainSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API