Legal Opinion

Perrong v. Vivint

District Court, D. Utah

Decided May 28, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00568Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH CRAIG CUNNINGHAM; and ANDREW PERRONG, on behalf of themselves and MEMORANDUM DECISION AND others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING [72] AND [73] MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT v. VIVINT, INC.; JOHN DOE CORPORATION, d.b.a. NATIONAL Case No. 2:19-cv-00568-DBB-CMR SOLAR PROGRAM; and DSI DISTRIBUTING, INC., d.b.a. DSI District Judge David Barlow SYSTEMS, Defendants. Before the court are two motions for partial summary judgment filed by Defendants DSI Distributing and Vivint (collectively, Defendants).1 Both motions seek summary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Cillo v. City of Greenwood VillageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API