Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Biaggi

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 5, 1987No. 87 Cr. 265 (CBM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

On July 13, 1987, defendant Richard Biaggi served a subpoena duces tecum pursuant to Fed.R.Crim P. 17(c) upon Independent Counsel James C. McKay, returnable November 9, 1987.1 That subpoena demanded production of:

1. All documents and/or information in your possession or under your control relating to the possibility that things of value were furnished to Edwin Meese, the Attorney General of the United States, directly or indirectly, by representatives of the Wedtech Corporation, including Mr. Meese’s lawyer, investment partner (and trustee) and former assistant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. IoziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. United States v. BiaggiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. United States v. DiLapiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. BiaggiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API