Legal Opinion

In re July 31, 2013, Decision of Board of Zoning Appeals

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided May 7, 2014No. Case No. CL-2013-13733Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Randy I. Bellows

Before the Court is Petitioner New Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., d/b/a AT&T Mobility’s (“AT&T” or “Petitioner”) appeal from the July 31, 2013, decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Fairfax County (“BZA”). Both the Original and Amended Petitions for Writ of Certiorari state that AT&T is the Petitioner in this case and that Mr. Donohue is counsel for AT&T. However, Mr. Donohue also represents the Parklawn Recreation Association (“Parklawn”) in this matter. Although AT&T and Parklawn submitted a joint application to the BZA, the Court will treat AT&T as the Petitioner…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors v. Snell Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  2. BOARD OF SUP'RS, ETC. v. Southland Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Ames v. Town of PainterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  4. Board of Supervisors v. LernerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  5. Board of Supervisors v. JacksonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API