Legal Opinion

Scully v. Murphy

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 2008No. A121935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARGULIES, J.

Under a will executed in 1961, Jean Marie Mooney left the bulk of her estate to her father or, if he predeceased her, to her two sisters, Doris and Lucile, in equal shares. By the time Mooney passed away in 2007, her father and both sisters had predeceased her. Both sisters were survived by adult children. This brought California’s antilapse statute, Probate Code1 section 21110, into play. The probate court construed section 21110 to require that each of the surviving adult children of Doris and Lucile receive an equal one-seventh share of Mooney’s estate. Lucile’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of PfadenhauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Estate of BegleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. In Re Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of MooneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API