Legal Opinion

Cutliff v. Densmore

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1958No. Docket 5, Calendar 47,450PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVoelker, J.

This case involves accretion * somewhat complicated by “decretion.” In the original government plat, made in 1855, the 4 lots in question abutted each other roughly in the shape of a block capital letter L. Lot 1, the northernmost of the 4 lots, was at the top of the vertical portion of the L. Lot 2 abutted lot 1 immediately to the south to form roughly the center of the vertical portion of the L. Lot 3 abutted lot 2 immediately to the south to form the base of the vertical portion of the L. Lot 4 abutted lot 3 immediately to the east to form the sole horizontal portion of the L.

In 1855 there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Dramis v. DunbarMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Jeffries v. SheehanMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jonkers v. Summit TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Weisenburger v. KirkwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Gregory v. LaFaiveMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Heeringa v. PetroeljeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Tennant v. Recreation Development Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API