Legal Opinion

People v. Medina

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 15, 1976No. 60727PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE MEJDA

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal by the State from an order suppressing an oral and a written statement of defendant, Jose Medina, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 604(a) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, par. 604(a)). The State on appeal does not challenge the findings of fact made by the trial court, but solely contends that the trial court misapplied the law to its findings in holding that defendant had not intelligently and knowingly waived his constitutional rights prior to his oral and written statements. We affirm. The pertinent facts follow.

O…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. The People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. BurbankIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. HenenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. United States v. John A. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MedinaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. MrozekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. People v. JordanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. People v. KennedyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. People v. McMillanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API